After two years of dating, a couple from Tennessee decided to get married, but Ariel’s fiance couldn’t afford to buy her an expensive ring. They went shopping together and bought a set of two rounds for $ 130, but the saleswoman made fun of him and said the crew was “pathetic” and “cheap” for the occasion.
The young woman’s response, in which she described the entire incident, quickly gained popularity online.
My husband and I do not live a wealthy lifestyle. After dating for two years, we realised that waiting to get engaged was pointless, despite our efforts to put food on the table and make ends meet.
I hadn’t even considered rings; I only wanted to get married to my best friend, but he insisted on getting me a call. He was able to accumulate enough cash to purchase two silver rings. I adore them, and I have them in my hands.
As we paid for them, a different store employee yelled, “I can’t believe what some men are buying today for an engagement ring!”. My husband was speechless, saying, “Oh, how pitiful.”.
Because he couldn’t afford the rings, I was eyeing them on Pinterest, and he was already embarrassed. She wanted more and frequently asked if I was content with them. He was disappointed that I couldn’t be happy because these rings weren’t expensive enough.
I told her it didn’t matter what kind of ring she got, just how much love she put into it. The rounds went with me. I would have wed him if he hadn’t taken a 25-cent toy ring from me.
Those are friendly gestures, to be sure, but when did material possessions become synonymous with love that we believe a man can only truly love a woman if he buys her a $3,000 ring and declares his love in public?
If My husband worried I would reject him ifcouldn’t afford to buy was afraid I might grow to dislike Im. It’s awful that society has conditioned us to think this.
I’m married now, wearing 130-dollar rings on each hand, and the love of my life is standing next to me. What more could I possibly want in life?
